A Decade-Long Tug of War Finally Concludes: "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Bill" Heads to Senate
Original Title: "Security or Commodity? Ten-Year Tug of War Ends, 'Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act' Heads to Senate"
Original Author: Ding Dang, Odaily
On December 10, U.S. Senators Gillibrand and Lummis stated at the Blockchain Association Policy Summit that the "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act)" is expected to release a draft this weekend and enter the amendment and hearing voting stage next week. This means that this long-awaited legislative project is officially entering a decisive window.
The bill was first formally introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 29, 2025, by House Financial Services Committee Chair Patrick McHenry and Digital Assets and Innovation Subcommittee Chair French Hill. It passed the House on July 17 by an overwhelming majority (294 votes in favor) and is currently awaiting final Senate review.
Core Design of the Bill: Classification Rather Than One-Size-Fits-All
The core of the "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" lies in its attempt to end the ten-year tug of war between U.S. regulatory agencies and the industry over "whether it is a security or a commodity." It is the first time that a clear boundary has been drawn for digital assets in legislative form, avoiding a "one-size-fits-all" regulatory approach and instead adopting a classification regulatory framework. Specifically:
Lega Distinction Between "Digital Commodity" and "Digital Security"
The bill clearly defines the vast majority of tokens issued natively on decentralized blockchains as "digital commodities" and transfers regulatory authority to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); only tokens that meet the Howey test and exhibit typical "investment contract" characteristics will continue to be regulated by the SEC under securities regulations.
Exemption Pathway for "Mature Blockchains"
To avoid all tokens being forcibly classified as securities, the bill establishes a "mature blockchain system" standard: when a blockchain satisfies both "high decentralization" (where no single entity controls over 20% of the token supply or validation power and the network's value primarily comes from actual usage) it can exempt SEC from security registration requirements. This provides a clear pathway for mainstream assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, ensuring that regulation does not stifle technological progress.
Secondary Market Fully Shifts to CFTC Regulation
The bill requires all platforms engaged in digital commodity spot or derivative trading to register with the CFTC as a "Digital Commodity Exchange" (DCE), digital commodity broker, or dealer. Considering the industry reality, the bill also specifically establishes a 360-day "temporary registration" pathway to ensure that existing compliant platforms will not be forced to shut down due to technical violations during the transition period, thus achieving a smooth transition.
Limited Financing Exemption
Even for initial token offerings on mature blockchains that are still considered "investment contracts," issuers can apply for an exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Securities Act, but the annual fundraising total cannot exceed $75 million and must fulfill more stringent disclosure obligations. This design aims to strike a balance between encouraging innovation and protecting investors.
Division of Labor Between CFTC and SEC: From Confrontation to Collaboration
For a long time, the ongoing tug-of-war between the SEC and CFTC over jurisdiction of digital assets has been described by the industry as the "Achilles' heel" of the crypto industry. Regulatory uncertainty has even been considered a significant hidden cost suppressing domestic innovation in the United States. If the "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" is formally enacted, it will legislatively end this situation, establishing a clear division of responsibilities: the CFTC will become the core regulator of the secondary market for digital commodities, while the SEC will focus on token issuances and private placements that still exhibit security-like attributes in the primary market.
To ensure that the two agencies maintain coordination in cross-over areas, the bill requires the establishment of a permanent "Joint Advisory Committee." Either party must formally respond to non-binding recommendations made by the committee when formulating rules that may affect the jurisdiction of the other party. This mechanism aims to prevent future regulatory vacuums or duplicative regulation.
At the same time, the bill provides clear protection for the decentralized finance ecosystem: front-end protocol developers, node validators, miners, and other non-custodial, nonprofit roles will be explicitly excluded from the definitions of "broker" or "dealer," significantly reducing compliance burdens at the protocol level and preserving reasonable space for technological innovation.
Simultaneous Implementation of Supporting Actions: CFTC is "Taking the Lead"
As the Senate review of the "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" enters a critical stage, on December 5th, Acting Chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Caroline D. Pham announced that spot cryptocurrency products would be permitted for trading on CFTC-regulated futures trading platforms for the first time.
Pham stated that this move is part of the Trump administration's effort to establish the U.S. as the "Crypto Capital of the World," aiming to address the lack of protections on offshore trading platforms by providing a regulated domestic market.
Additionally, as part of the "Crypto Sprint" initiative, the CFTC will also promote the use of tokenized collateral (including stablecoins) in the derivatives market and amend rules to support the application of blockchain technology in infrastructure such as clearing and settlement. This effort will enhance the CFTC's leadership role in the digital asset space, aligning closely with the spirit of the legislation.
Trump Nomination Fast-Track: Crypto-Friendly Leadership in Place
Since Trump's second term, the personnel layout of major U.S. financial regulatory agencies has continued to lean towards supporting digital assets, becoming a key catalyst for the accelerated development of the crypto industry.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul Atkins, in an interview with CNBC, stated that the U.S.'s "resistance" to cryptocurrency has been "for too long." Atkins, appointed by Trump, took office in 2025. He views the "Crypto Market Structure Act" as part of "Project Crypto," aimed at bringing order and fairness to the classification of digital assets through legislation and rules.
At the same time, on October 25, 2025, Trump nominated Brian Quintenz to serve as CFTC Chairman and Commissioner. Quintenz, a former crypto lawyer, represented several crypto companies at the Willkie Farr & Gallagher law firm (such as venture capital funds and blockchain projects) and has been serving as Chief Legal Advisor to the SEC's Crypto Task Force since March 2025, reporting directly to Atkins.
Trump also nominated Travis Hill to serve as Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), having already served as Acting Chairman in 2025. Hill is also crypto-friendly, publicly supporting banks entering crypto custody and stablecoin issuance, believing this can enhance financial inclusion. The FDIC serves as the interface between banks and crypto (such as stablecoin issuers), and his appointment may facilitate banks' entry into the crypto space.
Following the government's resumption of operations, the SEC has also introduced a series of institutional optimization schemes to expedite ETF approval processes. The overall signal is crystal clear: regulatory logic is transitioning from defensive management to structural acceptance.
Conclusion: The U.S. is Filling in the "Crypto Rule of Law Puzzle"
More importantly, the advancement of the "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" may solidify the effectiveness of the "American Stablecoin Innovation Act" signed by Trump earlier this year, which has provided a secure framework for stablecoin issuance. This bill further complements the legislative puzzle of the crypto industry, filling in market structure gaps, and propelling the United States from a "follower" to a "leader" in global crypto regulation.
Overall, these policies and personnel changes foreshadow a structural opportunity for the U.S. crypto ecosystem, where regulatory clarity may attract more institutional funding. However, challenges have not disappeared, such as coordinating DeFi regulatory details and aligning with international standards. But for global crypto practitioners, this is not just a U.S. story, but a crucial window of opportunity for the entire industry.
You may also like

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds

See “Buy Walls” & “Sell Walls” Instantly: WEEX Launches the Depth Chart for Smarter Trades

What Is Quick Trade on WEEX? 2 Ways WEEX Ends Chart-Panel Jumping

Morning News | Five major virtual asset platforms in South Korea have experienced 57 incidents of hacking and system failures in six years; Grayscale submits registration application for Canton ETF

Should we escape the peak? The principle of the tail-end market in the stock market
Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders
What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching
Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.
Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.
