Balancer Hack Cascading Effect: Why Did XUSD Break the Buck?

By: blockbeats|2026/03/28 22:06:35
0
Share
copy
Original Article Author: Omer Goldberg, Chaos Labs
Original Article Translation: DeepTech TechFlow

Summary

Several hours after the DeFi space experienced widespread uncertainty due to a vulnerability attack on the multi-chain platform @Balancer, @berachain performed an emergency hard fork, and @SonicLabs froze the attacker's wallet.

Subsequently, the price of Stream Finance's xUSD stablecoin significantly deviated from its target range, exhibiting a clear de-pegging event.

Long-Standing Issues Resurface

The long-standing controversies surrounding leverage, oracle reliance, and Proof of Reserves (PoR) transparency once again took center stage.

This is precisely the case of a typical "reflexivity stress event" outlined in our "DeFi's Black Box/Treasury" article last Friday.

Balancer Hack Cascading Effect: Why Did XUSD Break the Buck?

What Happened? / Background

The Balancer v2 vulnerability emerged across multiple chains, and for a considerable amount of time, it was unclear which pools were affected, which networks or integrated protocols were directly exposed to risk.

Capital Panic in an Information Vacuum

In the information vacuum, capital's response was as expected: depositors rushed to withdraw liquidity from anywhere they perceived to be potentially impacted directly or indirectly, including Stream Finance.

Transparency Dispute

Stream Finance currently does not maintain a comprehensive transparency dashboard or Proof of Reserve; however, it does provide a link to the Debank Bundle to display its on-chain positions.

However, following the vulnerability outbreak, these modest disclosures failed to definitively address the risk exposure issue: the price of xUSD (Stream's yield-bearing USD product) dropped from the target price of $1.26 to $1.15, currently rebounding to $1.20, while users reported withdrawal suspensions.

Risks and Controversies of Stream Finance

Stream is an on-chain capital allocation platform that utilizes user funds to implement high-yield, high-risk investment strategies.

Its portfolio construction involves significant leverage to make the system more resilient under pressure. However, the protocol has recently come under public scrutiny due to controversies surrounding a recursive minting mechanism.

While the current situation does not directly indicate a liquidity crisis, it unveils the market's high sensitivity. When negative news emerges and confidence is questioned, the shift from "probably fine" to "immediately redeem" often occurs swiftly.

xUSD is used as collateral distributed across curated markets on multiple chains, including Euler, Morpho, and Silo, spanning ecosystems like Plasma, Arbitrum, and Plume.

The protocol itself carries significant risk exposure in these markets, with the largest exposure being $84 million USDT borrowed against xUSD collateral on Plasma.

Collateralization Mechanism and Risk Buffering

When the market price of xUSD falls below its book value, relevant positions are not immediately liquidated. This is because many markets do not peg the collateral's value to the spot AMM price but rely on hardcoded or "base value" oracle feeds that track assets' reported backing rather than current secondary market prices.

During calm periods, this design can help mitigate tail risk liquidation due to short-term volatility, especially in stable products. This is also why DeFi protocols outperformed centralized platforms during the liquidation wave on October 10.

However, this design can also swiftly turn price discovery into trust discovery: selecting a base (or hardcoded) oracle requires thorough due diligence, including the authenticity, stability, and risk characteristics of the asset backing.

In short, this mechanism only applies when full Proof of Reserve is available and redemption can be completed in a reasonable time frame. Otherwise, the risk is that the lender or depositor may ultimately bear the consequences of default.

Stress Test on Arbitrum

Using Arbitrum as an example, the current market price of the MEV Capital Curated xUSD Morpho Market has fallen below the LLTV (Minimum Loan-to-Value). If the anchoring price of xUSD cannot recover, in a scenario where the utilization reaches 100% and the borrowing rate soars to 88%, the market may further deteriorate.

We are not against base layer oracles; on the contrary, they play a crucial role in preventing unfair liquidations caused by short-term fluctuations. Similarly, we are not against tokenization or even centralized yield-bearing assets. However, we advocate for basic transparency and the adoption of modern, systematic, and professional risk management when deploying currency markets around these assets.

Curated Markets can be an engine for responsible growth, but they should not devolve into a race to sacrifice security and rationality for the sake of chasing yields.

If what is built is a "domino-like" complex structure, then the collapse should not be surprising when the first gust of wind blows. As the industry professionalizes and some yield products become more structured (but potentially more opaque to end-users), risk stakeholders must raise the bar.

Although we hope to eventually resolve the issues for affected users properly, this incident should serve as a wake-up call for the entire industry.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Morning News | CME Group launches Nasdaq Cryptocurrency Index futures; Asset management giant Janus Henderson strategically invests in Ethena

Overview of Important Market Events on June 10

Bitcoin Layer 2 Network Botanix: Why Did We Choose to Dissolve?

The Bitcoin L2 star project Botanix announced a gradual shutdown, with the team admitting to facing severe challenges from the failure of its business model and the prevailing trends. Users are urged to withdraw all assets before July 9, 2026.

Why did Oracle deliver the strongest financial report in history, yet its stock price fell?

Oracle's revenue for fiscal year 2026 set a record, with AI cloud orders soaring to $638 billion, but massive capital expenditures on computing power led to negative free cash flow, causing a 5% drop in after-hours stock prices.

When the P2P illicit funds from ten years ago turned into 60,000 bitcoins

The largest Bitcoin money laundering case in the UK has new developments: 16,000 Chinese victims are pursuing 61,000 seized Bitcoins across borders, and the dispute over the applicability of UK and Chinese laws will directly determine whether the victims can share in the soaring profits.

Dialogue with OmenX Founder: Why does the prediction market need an evolution from "spot" to "derivatives"?

How to reconstruct the prediction market using leverage?

Galaxy in-depth report: Is Solana still worth paying attention to?

Solana did not fall behind during the bear market. Trading enthusiasm has waned, but the network is more stable, RWA and stablecoins are expanding, and the capital foundation is much thicker than in the previous cycle. The real question is: when the speculative tide recedes, can perpetuals, predicti...

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com