Bitcoin Mining Survival Threshold: How Miners are Adapting to a 35% Profit Plunge
Original Title: The Miners's Mirage
Original Author: Prathik Desai, Token Dispatch
Original Translation: Chopper, ForesightNews
The financial logic of Bitcoin miners is quite simple: they rely on a fixed protocol reward for their survival but have to deal with fluctuating real-world expenses. When the market is volatile, they are the first to feel the pressure on their balance sheets. Miners' revenue comes from selling the mined Bitcoins, while the operational costs mainly consist of electricity for running the heavy-duty computers for mining.
This week, I tracked some key data of Bitcoin miners: the network's reward to miners, the cost of earning this income, the remaining profit after deducting cash expenses, and the final net profit after accounting.
At the current Bitcoin price below $90,000, miners are in distress. Over the past two months, the 7-day average miner revenue has dropped by 35% from $60 million to $40 million.

Let me break down the key logic in detail.
Bitcoin's revenue mechanism is fixed and coded into the protocol. The mining reward for each block is 3.125 Bitcoins, with an average block time of 10 minutes, producing approximately 144 blocks per day, equivalent to a daily total network mining output of about 450 Bitcoins. Calculated over 30 days, global Bitcoin miners collectively mine 13,500 Bitcoins, valued at about $1.2 billion at the current $88,000 Bitcoin price. However, if this income is distributed among the record 1078 EH/s (exahashes) of hash rate, the final income per TH/s (terahash) of hash rate per day is only 3.6 cents, supporting the entire economic foundation of this $1.7 trillion network security. (Note: 1 EH/s = 10^18 H/s; 1 TH/s = 10^12 H/s)
In terms of costs, electricity is the most critical variable, with its cost depending on the mining location and machine efficiency.
If modern mining machines of the S21 class are used (power consumption of 17 joules per terahash) and access to cheap electricity is available, miners can still achieve cash profitability. However, if the mining operation relies on older equipment or has to pay high electricity prices, each hash calculation will increase the cost. At the current hash price (influenced by network difficulty, Bitcoin price, block subsidy, and transaction fees), an S19 miner, if using electricity priced at $0.06 per kWh, can barely break even. Once the network difficulty increases, Bitcoin price slightly drops, or electricity prices surge, its economic viability will further deteriorate.
Let me analyze this with some specific data.
In December 2024, CoinShares estimated that the cash cost for a publicly listed mining company to mine 1 Bitcoin in the third quarter of 2024 was approximately $55,950. Today, the University of Cambridge's estimate has risen to around $58,500. The actual mining costs vary among different miners: Marathon Digital, the world's largest publicly listed Bitcoin mining company (ticker symbol MARA), has an average energy cost of $39,235 per Bitcoin mined in the third quarter of 2025; the second-largest listed mining company, Riot Blockchain (ticker symbol RIOT), has a cost of $46,324. Despite a 30% drop in the Bitcoin price from its peak to $86,000, these mining companies are still profitable. However, this is not the whole truth.
Miners also need to consider non-cash expenses, including depreciation, impairment, and stock option compensation, which collectively make mining a capital-intensive industry. Once these costs are taken into account, the total cost of mining 1 Bitcoin can easily exceed $100,000.

Top Mining Companies Marathon and Riot's Mining Costs
MARA uses both self-owned mining machines and third-party hosted equipment for mining. MARA incurs electricity, depreciation, and hosting costs. A rough calculation shows that its total mining cost per Bitcoin exceeds $110,000. Even CoinShares' estimated total mining cost in December 2024 was approximately $106,000.
At first glance, the Bitcoin mining industry appears robust. The cash profit margin is high, accounting profitability is achievable, and the operating scale is large enough to easily raise funds. However, upon deeper analysis, you will understand why more and more miners are choosing to hold the mined Bitcoins, or even accumulate more Bitcoins from the market, rather than selling immediately.

Top Mining Companies' Bitcoin Reserves
Strong mining companies like MARA can cover their costs because they have ancillary businesses and access to the capital markets. However, many other mining companies may face losses as soon as the network difficulty increases again.
Overall, the mining industry has two coexisting profit and loss equilibrium scenarios:
The first is large-scale industrial miners, who have efficient mining machines, cheap electricity, and a strong balance sheet. For them, the daily cash flow turns negative only when the Bitcoin price drops from $86,000 to $50,000. Currently, their cash profit per mined Bitcoin exceeds $40,000, but whether they can achieve accounting profitability at the current price level varies by miner.
The second is the rest of the mining community, who will struggle to maintain a profit and loss equilibrium once depreciation, impairment, and stock option expenses are taken into account.
Even with a conservative estimate of the total cost per Bitcoin ranging from $90,000 to $110,000, many miners have already fallen below the economic breakeven point. They continue mining because the cash cost has not been breached, but the accounting cost is exceeding the threshold. This may lead more miners to choose to hold Bitcoin rather than sell at current prices.
As long as the cash flow remains positive, miners will continue to mine. At a price level of $88,000, the entire system appears stable, but this is predicated on miners not selling Bitcoin. If the price of Bitcoin further drops or miners are forced to liquidate their holdings, they will approach the breakeven point.
Therefore, although a price crash will continue to impact retail and trading groups, it is currently less likely to hurt miners. However, if miners' financing channels become more restricted, the situation could deteriorate, leading to a breakdown of the growth flywheel, forcing miners to increase investment in ancillary businesses to sustain operations.
You may also like

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds
Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market
Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

