L1 is dead, Appchain should rise
Author: iwillpat
Compiled by: Jiahua, ChainCatcher
Since the era of "Rollup as a Service" (RaaS) began, the outcome has already been determined. This is a precursor to the execution layer falling into a death spiral and commoditization.
What I mean is that general-purpose L1 tokens will continue to trend towards zero, and possibly without exception. I will try to explain the reasons, and how I would pivot if I were an L1 operator.
The main drivers of L1 failure are as follows: linear token release, failed value propositions, poor management, and the industry's "leadership."
I will briefly elaborate on these points—these are just personal opinions, not conclusions.
The current form of linear staking release has some benefits, namely distribution through liquid staking ("My 7% annualized!"), but it has failed in several key areas.
Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) makes it easy for the "decentralization purists" who talk a big game to participate in network security, but it does not properly incentivize insiders, users, and developers. At best, it only incentivizes people to hold tokens, which does nothing to create any actual value.
I have heard the classic argument about PoS: large validators have economic incentives not to dump on you. But that hasn't stopped them from selling every possible unlock amount and block reward.
This leads to my next point: they sell because L1 tokens have no long-term value proposition.
A "Tissue" That Breaks with a Poke
The arguments about "Gas tokens" and "governance" are old and unconvincing—like two Bounty tissues that fall apart with a single poke. The value of network tokens depends on what you can buy with them.
Therefore, the goal of all blockchain teams should be to promote their tokens as widely as possible for circulation as currency. In the pursuit of higher TPS and lower block times, the industry's vision of "peer-to-peer electronic cash" seems to have been lost.
To put it bluntly: throughput, TVL, and low latency do not give tokens any value. Liquidity and usage do.
The next point is the most practical and painful: blockchain "labs." (And various foundations.)
Dumping tokens after the lock-up period, off-market trades at huge discounts, jaw-dropping operational expenses, incentive programs to attract hot money, hiring "KOLs"... we can all name a few.
Ultimately, every penny spent by Labs is a tax levied on token holders. Unless the Labs generate revenue through some service, first-party wallet, or application, they are surviving by selling tokens.
This is not necessarily a bad thing—they provide valuable services through engineering resources, browsers, and APIs. But if Labs do not bring net new buying pressure to the tokens, and spending continues to rise unsustainably, they will slowly bleed to death.
One of the primary goals
You may also like

Morning Report | Strategy sold 32 BTC and over 800,000 shares of MSTR last week; Binance officially announced its U.S. stock trading portal; Polymarket reached an exclusive partnership with OneFootball

Zhou Hang: How much is SpaceX really worth?

IOSG: From Coinbase to Upbit: How a Token Completes a 28-Day Journey of Taking Over

Exclusive Interview with Alpaca CEO: What is the background of the US stock underlying service provider behind Binance and Bitget?

Variant: Three types of L1 assets are highly likely to become the main means of value storage

Does the performance on Perp DEX become an "invisible threshold" and "amplifier" for new coins to go live on CEX?

a16z Crypto's latest article: Why do we need to predict the market?

Strategy cashes out 2.5 million USD, but Bitcoin's market value dropped by 80 billion USD in one day

Collective Change of Ownership for Crypto Exchanges? The Positioning Competition Among South Korean Financial Giants

WEEXPERIENCE Trading Bootcamp in Poland: How WEEX & FireCrew Are Making Crypto Trading Accessible to Everyone

Paris Reigns Supreme: How PSG Crushed Arsenal’s Dream in a Historic UCL Final Thriller

Full text and analysis of the speech by the CEO of SanDisk at the 42nd Annual Strategic Decision Conference of Bernstein

TaiJi completes $3.5 million strategic financing, with investments from Castrum Capital, Becker Ventures, and Coinvestor Ventures

Bitcoin Stuck Near $73K? How Traders Are Finding Rewards in a Sideways June Market

What Is a Bitcoin ETF? A Simple Guide for 2026

Best AI Crypto Coins 2026: Top 7 Tokens Ranked by Data

How to Stake Solana: A Step-by-Step Guide for 2026

