The core problem with BTC
By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/02 21:30:01
0
Share
Homepage > News > Editorial > The core problem with BTC For many years now, I have written that BTC has become “a soft money” and attempted to warn a community I once believed in that the path of convenience, politics, and social consensus was leading them into the arms of the very systems they claimed to oppose—one where an oligarchical intelligentsia rules a new world technocracy that is more oppressive than the last. Now, in the spring of 2025, that warning is bearing (more) bitter fruit for the small blockers. A new proposal from Bitcoin Core developers seek to remove longstanding limits on the OP_RETURN function, a change that speaks volumes about the true nature of BTC in its current form and culture. And it’s not good. They say BTC doesn’t change. Right now, they’re all fighting about who gets to change it – again. — Kurt Wuckert Jr (@kurtwuckertjr) April 30, 2025 The proposal in question, advanced by Peter Todd, would eliminate the 80-byte cap on OP_RETURN output scripts in BTC. That limit was originally imposed, if you believe the rhetoric, as a safeguard to prevent abuse, to encourage monetary uses of the protocol, and to keep node storage burdens modest. In reality, it was pushed almost exclusively by Luke Dashjr to kill off Satoshi Dice, CounterParty tokens and everyone else in 2015 who was doing cool stuff with Bitcoin. “all “standardness” rules are conceptually problematic to the very core” Almost all the standardness rules are either avoiding actual DoS attacks like excessive checksigs, or leaving room for soft fork upgrades. The DoS attacks should be fixed of course – hopefully the Great... — Peter Todd (@peterktodd) April 29, 2025 Proponents of the new change now argue that these constraints are arbitrary, outdated, or easily circumvented and that removing them merely reflects reality. But reality, as always with BTC, is contested terrain, and it’s increasingly clear that reality is whatever the High Priests of Bitcoin Core decree—which is a problem because about 99% of the BTC network is running the “Core” reference client software—a dangerous level of centralization. Bitcoin Core is completely captured. If you’re still running it (~99% of nodes are), then there’s no other way to say it – you are facilitating an ongoing attack on Bitcoin. Your use of the software is giving the attackers the power to carry out their attack. Remove that power. — Bitcoin Lebowski (@DudeJLebowski) April 29, 2025 Let’s pause to consider the architecture here. In the BTC Core world, policy changes begin life as GitHub pull requests, vetted by a small cohort of developers and eventually merged into the reference implementation. If you raise concerns—as one contributor recently did, eloquently and at length—you are told to “vote with your feet” or your hash. Or worse, you are ratioed, flagged, silenced, or dismissed. This is not decentralization. It is a bureaucracy with a command line and a direct repudiation of what Bitcoin was supposed to be. And that’s half the problem, since bad actors have taken over Bitcoin Core maintainership. — Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) May 1, 2025 The original vision, as Satoshi outlined and as BSV continues to uphold, is a system governed not by invisible developer councils or sacred repositories, but by the free market itself. In BSV, consensus rules are generalized and then locked such that most things are policy rules to be configured by competing node operators. Those node operators choose the rules they enforce, and users choose to connect to the nodes they trust. The balance of power is spread across competing commercial interests, not consolidated behind a single GitHub repo guarded like the Holy of Holies. Lopp was literally rubbing it in our faces that he fully intends to rape us. This isn’t just some disagreement: they are literally committing violence against Bitcoiners. — Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) April 30, 2025 This is the core philosophical difference: BTC is governed by a strict hierarchical committee. BSV is governed by competing market incentives of commercial operators. And it matters. When policy becomes protocol and protocol becomes ideology, Bitcoin ceases to be money and becomes a meme. This is what I mean when I say that BTC is a soft money: it is not backed by consistent rules, or by the discipline of the market. It is steered by people, subject to politics, and vulnerable to moral panics and backroom bargains. It is, in the end, a fiat money in open-source clothing that never actually becomes serious for anything except the meme itself. This is the tragedy of the Bitcoin Civil War, and it is what I’ve spent years trying to explain. Bitcoin didn’t split because of a block size dispute. It split because one side believed in the sovereignty of protocol, and the other believed in the supremacy of social consensus. One side wanted money governed by honest actors, constrained by economic incentives, and flexible as a general-purpose money, payment system and distributed database. The other wanted money that could be tinkered with endlessly by those who claimed to “understand it best” and ultimately beholden to social signalling and constant jockeying of a bizarre mix of political forces. Knots runners are censoring financial related transactions. My node therefore rejects all connections to Knots. Fuck Knots and anyone that uses it. https://t.co/rhhtfFFHYs — noosphere888 #FREESAMOURAI (@noosphere888x2) April 30, 2025 We now know where that road leads: to policy changes locked behind pull request comment freezes. To governance by insiders. To a transactional system where few actually transact. And now to a redefinition of OP_RETURN; not because of demand, not because of competition, not because of any urgent need in the market, but because a small cabal of developers decided the rule was inconvenient for their own commercial needs, and therefore, deemed into the protocol. If that doesn’t make you pause, it should. Because what happens when it’s not OP_RETURN? What happens when they decide that your privacy is too subversive, or that your scaling solution is too unorthodox, or that your coins—mined honestly, used legally—are somehow suspect because they don’t align with the evolving orthodoxy of BTC Core? Or, imagine this: what happens when Peter Todd, the architect of this latest controversy, decides it’s finally time to raise the supply cap of BTC? Can you stop him, anon? This is Peter Todd. He thinks Satoshi Nakamoto did a bad job engineering bitcoin, so when HBO doxed him, Greg Maxwell (disgraced Wikimedia mod) didn’t write a long takedown piece just hours later. Because Peter helped destroy BTC’s usefulness as cash with his RBF work, Adam... pic.twitter.com/3wDJuuglkL — Kurt Wuckert Jr (@kurtwuckertjr) October 9, 2024 The answer is simple: you get forked off the network. Or you get banned. Or you get ignored until your network dies. In BSV, we have chosen another path. Our network is open. Our rules are stable and predictable. Our governance is minimal and easy to understand. We welcome competition between node clients, service providers, miners, merchants, wallets, and users. And while we are not perfect, we are principled—and that’s the part that matters. The way forward is not to consolidate power further. It is to disperse it. It is to allow policy settings to compete. To let wallets and exchanges and miners decide, on the open market, what rules make sense for their own businesses. That is the path to scaling. That is the path to adoption. And that is the only path to money that is truly sound. A sound money must be hard in every sense: hard to change, hard to censor, and hard to kill. BTC has failed that test. Again. But Bitcoin, the real Bitcoin, the protocol etched into the white paper and revived in BSV, has never failed that test. Watch: Mining Disrupt 2025 Highlights: Profitable trends every miner should know title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0′′ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen> Source: https://coingeek.com/the-core-problem-with-btc/
You may also like

Why Is BlackRock Investing $5 Billion in the SpaceX IPO?
What is driving the massive demand for the SpaceX IPO, and why did BlackRock place a $5 billion order? Learn how the historic listing could impact SpaceX stock, Bitcoin, SPCX, and crypto markets.

Cryptocurrency market makers collectively seek change as it becomes increasingly difficult to make money
There is more and more to do.

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash flow is the moat
Most companies spend years creating network effects on traditional infrastructure. Crypto founders inherit them as starting conditions.

Citibank releases "2030 Asset Tokenization Market Outlook": 6 major trends may create a $8.2 trillion market
The tokenization of financial assets is moving from pilot projects to large-scale implementation, but this is a gradual evolution rather than a fierce revolution.

The trillion-dollar valuation test: Are the three major super IPOs a celebration for tech stocks or a nightmare for the crypto market?
Tech giants like SpaceX and OpenAI have sparked a $35 trillion super IPO wave. The "suction effect" is not enough to crash the stock and crypto markets, but the test of high valuations is just beginning.

Morning Report | Digital Asset completes $355 million financing led by a16z Crypto; Meta completes operational separation from Manus
Overview of Important Market Events on June 11

Morning News | CME Group launches Nasdaq Cryptocurrency Index futures; Asset management giant Janus Henderson strategically invests in Ethena
Overview of Important Market Events on June 10

Bitcoin Layer 2 Network Botanix: Why Did We Choose to Dissolve?
The Bitcoin L2 star project Botanix announced a gradual shutdown, with the team admitting to facing severe challenges from the failure of its business model and the prevailing trends. Users are urged to withdraw all assets before July 9, 2026.

Why did Oracle deliver the strongest financial report in history, yet its stock price fell?
Oracle's revenue for fiscal year 2026 set a record, with AI cloud orders soaring to $638 billion, but massive capital expenditures on computing power led to negative free cash flow, causing a 5% drop in after-hours stock prices.

When the P2P illicit funds from ten years ago turned into 60,000 bitcoins
The largest Bitcoin money laundering case in the UK has new developments: 16,000 Chinese victims are pursuing 61,000 seized Bitcoins across borders, and the dispute over the applicability of UK and Chinese laws will directly determine whether the victims can share in the soaring profits.

Dialogue with OmenX Founder: Why does the prediction market need an evolution from "spot" to "derivatives"?
How to reconstruct the prediction market using leverage?

Galaxy in-depth report: Is Solana still worth paying attention to?
Solana did not fall behind during the bear market. Trading enthusiasm has waned, but the network is more stable, RWA and stablecoins are expanding, and the capital foundation is much thicker than in the previous cycle. The real question is: when the speculative tide recedes, can perpetuals, predicti...

Young people in South Korea make a "final effort" in the epic bull market
The South Koreans' average of two accounts for wildly gambling in the chip bull market reflects the survival anxiety and harsh reality of countless young people trying to break through class barriers behind the nationwide stock trading frenzy for wealth.

The pricing controversy of Trade.xyz exposes the fatal weakness of Pre-IPO perpetual contracts
SpaceX's equity update has sparked controversy over on-chain liquidations. Trade.xyz refuses to reset the SPCX pricing, and the lack of a Rebase mechanism in Perp DEX has led to a significant trust test for on-chain Pre-IPO assets.

How much longer can Ethereum's last big buyer hold on?
According to Bitmine's current buying pace, the 5% target is expected to be reached next month, and at that time, there may be no further increases in holdings. So, who will fill the buying gap for Ethereum?

World Cup 2026 Coming – WEEX Celebrates with $1M Prize Pool & Michael Owen Live
The 2026 FIFA World Cup is hours away. WEEX unveils the “World Cup x Dice Rush” campaign with a 1,000,000 USDT prize pool. Plus, Michael Owen reunites with WEEX COO for an exclusive pre-match livestream. Join now!

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing
Overview of Important Market Events on June 9th

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?
The platform that wins this competition will be the one whose execution layer is the hardest to replicate, whose builder ecosystem delivers the fastest, and whose regulatory path is the most open.
Why Is BlackRock Investing $5 Billion in the SpaceX IPO?
What is driving the massive demand for the SpaceX IPO, and why did BlackRock place a $5 billion order? Learn how the historic listing could impact SpaceX stock, Bitcoin, SPCX, and crypto markets.
Cryptocurrency market makers collectively seek change as it becomes increasingly difficult to make money
There is more and more to do.
a16z Crypto Partner: Cash flow is the moat
Most companies spend years creating network effects on traditional infrastructure. Crypto founders inherit them as starting conditions.
Citibank releases "2030 Asset Tokenization Market Outlook": 6 major trends may create a $8.2 trillion market
The tokenization of financial assets is moving from pilot projects to large-scale implementation, but this is a gradual evolution rather than a fierce revolution.
The trillion-dollar valuation test: Are the three major super IPOs a celebration for tech stocks or a nightmare for the crypto market?
Tech giants like SpaceX and OpenAI have sparked a $35 trillion super IPO wave. The "suction effect" is not enough to crash the stock and crypto markets, but the test of high valuations is just beginning.
Morning Report | Digital Asset completes $355 million financing led by a16z Crypto; Meta completes operational separation from Manus
Overview of Important Market Events on June 11
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com
