Trump, Tiptoeing the Edge of the Constitution: The Night Before Taking Office, He Capitalized on a MEME Coin Craze
Original Article by: Zack Guzmán, Founder and Host of Coinage_media
Article Translation by: Ashley, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: The author points out that the Trump family cleverly circumvented the Constitution's Emoluments Clause controversy when launching the $TRUMP and $MELANIA tokens. By strategically entering the NFT and cryptocurrency space early on, they leveraged Web3 to maximize their interests within legal boundaries.
The following is the original content (slightly reorganized for better readability):
The Trump family rapidly rolled out the $TRUMP and $MELANIA tokens just before the inauguration ceremony for a very crucial reason. Whether you love or hate Trump, the fact is, delaying even one more day could have exposed him to the risk of constitutional violations and potential impeachment once again.
According to the Constitution, the President must not abuse their power for personal gain. In particular, the Emoluments Clause explicitly prohibits the President from receiving benefits or profits from foreign governments. This is precisely why these tokens are so noteworthy.
Over the past few years, the Trump couple has been testing the market waters through various NFT releases. They have used separate companies and seemingly different teams. These companies have paid Melania and Trump respective fees, thus maintaining the "independence" of direct token purchases.

According to Trump's public tax filings, he earned approximately $7.2 million through involvement in NFT-related transactions. This income is linked to his partnership with CIC Digital in the $TRUMP project. Melania, on the other hand, earned over $330,000 through an agreement related to NFT sales.

Despite all this appearing convoluted, one thing is certain: launching these tokens before Trump formally became President made things easier. Failing to do so would have made it easier to allege that Trump benefited from the presidency and violated the Emoluments Clause.
While our founding fathers hoped to prevent the President from unduly profiting from power, I don't think Jefferson or Madison ever discussed meme coins. What do you think?
You may also like

WSJ: Hyperliquid is becoming Wall Street's crypto "convenience store"

Morning Report | Robinhood completes acquisition of WonderFi for $180 million; Anthropic submits IPO draft application to SEC confidentially; Google plans to raise $80 billion in financing

Morning Report | Strategy sold 32 BTC and over 800,000 shares of MSTR last week; Binance officially announced its U.S. stock trading portal; Polymarket reached an exclusive partnership with OneFootball

Zhou Hang: How much is SpaceX really worth?

IOSG: From Coinbase to Upbit: How a Token Completes a 28-Day Journey of Taking Over

Exclusive Interview with Alpaca CEO: What is the background of the US stock underlying service provider behind Binance and Bitget?

Variant: Three types of L1 assets are highly likely to become the main means of value storage

Does the performance on Perp DEX become an "invisible threshold" and "amplifier" for new coins to go live on CEX?

a16z Crypto's latest article: Why do we need to predict the market?

Strategy cashes out 2.5 million USD, but Bitcoin's market value dropped by 80 billion USD in one day

Collective Change of Ownership for Crypto Exchanges? The Positioning Competition Among South Korean Financial Giants

WEEXPERIENCE Trading Bootcamp in Poland: How WEEX & FireCrew Are Making Crypto Trading Accessible to Everyone

Paris Reigns Supreme: How PSG Crushed Arsenal’s Dream in a Historic UCL Final Thriller

Full text and analysis of the speech by the CEO of SanDisk at the 42nd Annual Strategic Decision Conference of Bernstein

TaiJi completes $3.5 million strategic financing, with investments from Castrum Capital, Becker Ventures, and Coinvestor Ventures

Bitcoin Stuck Near $73K? How Traders Are Finding Rewards in a Sideways June Market

What Is a Bitcoin ETF? A Simple Guide for 2026




